| Baptism is not only a sign of profession and mark of
difference whereby Christians are distinguished from others that are not
baptized; but it is also a sign of regeneration or the new birth. The
Baptism of young children is to be retained in the Church.
Contemporary United Methodism is attempting to recover and revitalize
its understanding of baptism. To do this, we must look to our heritage
as Methodists and Evangelical United Brethren and, indeed, to the
foundations of Christian Tradition. Throughout our history, baptism has
been viewed in diverse and even contradictory ways. An enriched
understanding of baptism, restoring the Wesleyan blend of sacramental
and evangelical aspects, will enable United Methodists to participate in
the sacrament with renewed appreciation for this gift of God’s grace.
Within the Methodist tradition, baptism has long been a subject of
much concern, even controversy. John Wesley retained the sacramental
theology which he received from his Anglican heritage. He taught that in
baptism a child was cleansed of the guilt of original sin, initiated
into the covenant with God, admitted into the Church, made an heir of
the divine kingdom, and spiritually born anew. He said that while
baptism was neither essential to nor sufficient for salvation, it was
the “ordinary means” that God designated for applying the benefits
of the work of Christ in human lives.
On the other hand, although he affirmed the regenerating grace of
infant baptism, he also insisted upon the necessity of adult conversion
for those who have fallen from grace. A person who matures into moral
accountability must respond to God’s grace in repentance and faith.
Without personal decision and commitment to Christ, the baptismal gift
is rendered ineffective.
Baptism for Wesley, therefore, was a part of the lifelong process of
salvation. He saw spiritual rebirth as a twofold experience in the
normal process of Christian development -- to be received through
baptism in infancy and through commitment to Christ later in life.
Salvation included both God’s initiating activity of grace and a
willing human response.
In its development in the United States, Methodism was unable to
maintain this Wesleyan balance of sacramental and evangelical emphases.
Access to the sacraments was limited during the late eighteenth and
early nineteenth centuries when the Methodist movement was largely under
the leadership of laypersons who were not authorized to administer them.
On the American frontier where human ability and action were stressed,
the revivalistic call for individual decision-making, though important,
was subject to exaggeration. The sacramental teachings of Wesley tended
to be ignored. In this setting, while infant baptism continued not only
to be practiced, but also to be vigorously defended, its significance
became weakened and ambiguous.
Later toward the end of the nineteenth century, the theological views
of much of Methodism were influenced by a new set of ideas which had
become dominant in American culture. These ideas included optimism about
the progressive improvement of humankind and confidence in the social
benefits of scientific discovery, technology, and education. Assumptions
of original sin gave way before the assertion that human nature was
essentially unspoiled. In this intellectual milieu, the old evangelical
insistence upon conversion and spiritual rebirth seemed quaint and
unnecessary.
Thus the creative Wesleyan synthesis of sacramentalism and
evangelicalism was torn asunder and both its elements devalued. As a
result, infant baptism was variously interpreted and often reduced to a
ceremony of dedication. Adult baptism was sometimes interpreted as a
profession of faith and public acknowledgment of God’s grace, but was
more often viewed simply as an act of joining the Church. By the middle
of the twentieth century, Methodism in general had ceased to understand
baptism as authentically sacramental. Rather than an act of divine
grace, it was seen as an expression of human choice. Baptism was also a
subject of concern and controversy in the Evangelical and United
Brethren traditions that were brought together in 1946 in The
Evangelical United Brethren Church. Their early pietistic revivalism,
based upon belief in the availability of divine grace and the freedom of
human choice, emphasized bringing people to salvation through Christian
experience. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, both
Evangelical and United Brethren theologians stressed the importance of
baptism as integral to the proclamation of the gospel, as a rite
initiating persons into the covenant community (paralleling
circumcision), and as a sign of the new birth, that gracious divine act
by which persons are redeemed from sin and reconciled to God. The former
Evangelical Church consistently favored the baptism of infants. The
United Brethren provided for the baptism of both infants and adults.
Following the union of 1946, The Evangelical United Brethren Church
adopted a ritual that included services of baptism for infants and
adults, and also a newly created service for the dedication of infants
that had little precedent in official rituals of either of the former
churches.
The 1960-64 revision of The Methodist Hymnal, including
rituals, gave denominational leaders an opportunity to begin to recover
the sacramental nature of baptism in contemporary Methodism. The General
Commission on Worship sounded this note quite explicitly in its
introduction to the new ritual in 1964:
In revising the Order for the Administration of Baptism, the
Commission on Worship has endeavored to keep in mind that baptism is a
sacrament, and to restore it to the Evangelical-Methodist concept set
forth in our Articles of Religion . . . Due recognition was taken of
the critical reexamination of the theology of the Sacrament of Baptism
which is currently taking place in ecumenical circles, and of its
theological content and implications.
The commission provided a brief historical perspective demonstrating
that the understanding of baptism as a sacrament had been weakened, if
not discarded altogether, over the years. Many in the Church regarded
baptism, both of infants and adults, as a dedication rather than as a
sacrament. The commission pointed out that in a dedication we make a
gift of a life to God for God to accept, while in a sacrament God offers
the gift of God’s unfailing grace for us to accept. The 1964 revision
of the ritual of the sacrament of baptism began to restore the rite to
its original and historic meaning as a sacrament.
In the 1989 The United Methodist Hymnal, the Services
of the Baptismal Covenant I, II and IV (taken from the 1984 official
ritual of the denomination as printed in The Book of Services)
continue this effort to reemphasize the historic significance of
baptism. These rituals, in accenting the reality of sin and of
regeneration, the initiating of divine grace and the necessity of
repentance and faith, are consistent with the Wesleyan combination of
sacramentalism and evangelicalism. |